主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 106-123.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

晚清时期梁启超宪法思想中的“人民程度”问题

  

  1. 上海交通大学凯原法学院
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-10 出版日期:2016-02-15 发布日期:2016-02-15
  • 作者简介:赖骏楠(1985—),男,上海交通大学凯原法学院讲师,上海 200030; junnanlai@ sjtu.edu.cn

The Problem of  "the Quality of the People"in Liang Qichao's Constitutional Thought during the Late Qing Period

  1. KoGuan Law School,Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Received:2015-08-10 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2016-02-15
  • About author:LAI Junnan ( KoGuan Law School,Shanghai Jiao Tong University; junnanlai@ sjtu.edu.cn)

摘要: 在晚清流亡日本时期,梁启超在多数时间内对于中国国民是否具备立宪国家国民所应具备的智识和道德能力,都抱有怀疑。梁对“人民程度” 问题的看法,先后经历了亡日前期、中期和后期三个阶段的发展。在后一个阶段,即从光绪三十三年至辛亥革命爆发,梁一方面积极主张迅速召开国会实现君主立宪,一方面则对“人民程度” 问题,拥有了一种更为现代、复杂和辩证的认识,尤其是对各种宪法制度本身对“人民程度” 问题能予以一定程度的消解或规避的认识。梁启超对“人民程度”问题的思索历程,体现出儒家传统中高度精英主义的思想倾向,以及该传统之一元论和唯智论的思维方式,在遭遇政治现代性时,所呈现出的复杂命运。

Abstract:  During his exile in Japan in the late Qing period,Liang Qichao was frequently skeptical of the Chinese people’s intellectual and moral capacities with respect to constructing a constitutional state. Liang’s views on the issue of“the quality of the people”had gone through a developmental process containing three stages:the earlier,the middle,and the later stages of his exile. In the aforementioned last stage,namely,from 1907 to 1911,Liang,on the one hand,advocated the opening of the national parliament as soon as possible,in order to achieve the goal of constitutional monarchy,and,on the other hand,developed a more modern,complex,and dialectical thought with respect to the issue of“the quality of the people.”In particular,he realized that various constitutional institutions themselves could,to some extent,resolve or circumvent the problem of“the quality of the people.”The intellectual history of Liang’s consideration on the issue of“the quality of the people”revealed the complicated fate of highly elitist thinking and the monistic and intellectualistic mode in the Confucian tradition at the time of the encounter between this tradition and political modernity.