清史研究
 
         首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  联系我们  |  English
清史研究  2018, Vol. 0 Issue (3): 16-32    DOI:
学术专论 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Article  |  Next Article  
清雍乾时期的“另记档案”清查
中国人民大学清史研究所
The Auditing of Separate-register Households during the Yongzheng and Qianlong Reigns
The Institute of Qing History,Renmin University of China
 全文: PDF (1042 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 清代旗籍中,另记档案户籍分为另户另记档案与自首另记档案两类。乾隆时期,自首另记档案人出旗,而另户另记档案则被保留下来作为军功赏赐之用。清廷制定了较为有效的善后措施,保证了另记档案清查的顺利进行。另记档案清查,是八旗走向规范化的关键一步,暂时缓解了八旗生计问题。而另记档案人的出旗,使得他们获得了更多的谋生路径,同时也加剧了旗人与民人之间的区隔。长远来看,另记档案清查、出旗并不能彻底解决八旗生计问题。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词另记档案   旗籍   八旗   雍正   乾隆   八旗生计     
Abstract: In the Qing dynasty, there were two types of Manchu“separate-register households”:the detached separate-register households(linghu lingji dang’an)and“self-declared”separateregister households(zishou lingji dang’an). During the Qianlong reign, the self-declared-separateregister households were not included in the Eight Banners system, while the detached separate-register households were kept in the system because they had received military awards. The Qing government undertook several effective measures in the auditing of separate-register households that helped to optimize the Eight Banners system, temporarily relieved the problem of banner livelihoods, and eased the financial pressures on the central government. The self-declared separate-register households received more opportunities to earn a living, but the changes intensified the division between bannermen and the Han people. In the long run, the auditing of the household registers could not fundamentally solve the various problems of Eight Banners livelihoods.
Key wordsseparate-register households   households registration of Eight Banners   Eight Banners   Yongzheng   Qianlong   livelihoods of Eight Banners   
作者简介: 屈成(1993—),男,中国人民大学清史研究所硕士生,北京 100872;qchengqs@163.com
引用本文:   
. 清雍乾时期的“另记档案”清查[J]. 清史研究, 2018, 0(3): 16-32.
. The Auditing of Separate-register Households during the Yongzheng and Qianlong Reigns[J]. Studies in Qing History, 2018, 0(3): 16-32.
 
[1] 安东强. 《孝经》与清代科举考试[J]. 清史研究, 2018, 0(1): 27-36.
[2] 陈晨. 巡察御史与雍正朝政治[J]. 清史研究, 2017, 0(3): 60-68.
[3] 杜家骥. 乾隆之生母及乾隆帝的汉人血统问题[J]. 清史研究, 2016, 0(2): 45-56.
[4] 郭文忠. 清朝与哈萨克汗国首次通使若干问题再探讨[J]. 清史研究, 2016, 0(1): 28-38.
[5] 王 刚. 清代绿营官兵编入八旗水师考析[J]. 清史研究, 2016, 0(1): 73-82.
[6] 哈斯巴根. 东洋文库藏镶白旗蒙古都统衙门档案述评[J]. 清史研究, 2015, 0(4): 69-79.
[7] 孙守朋. 乾隆二十八年京口驻防汉军出旗拨补与伊犁驻防[J]. 清史研究, 2015, 0(4): 100-106.
[8] 许宝蘅、许恪儒、马忠文. 清代及北洋政府时期中央机构档案及其管理——答韦庆远问[J]. 清史研究, 2014, 0(4): 108-118.
[9] 余新忠、陈思言. 2013年清史研究述评[J]. 清史研究, 2014, 0(4): 129-144.
[10] 王绪芬. 2013年清史论文索引[J]. 清史研究, 2014, 0(4): 145-156.
[11] 汤开建.  雍正教难期间驱逐传教士至广州事件始末考 [J]. 清史研究, 2014, 0(2): 1-33.
[12] 郑小悠 .  清代 “独子兼祧” 研究 [J]. 清史研究, 2014, 0(2): 55-64.
[13] 陈亚平.  保息斯民:雍正十年江南特大潮灾的政府应对[J]. 清史研究, 2014, 0(1): 82-92.
[14] 周琼. 乾隆朝粥赈制度研究[J]. 清史研究, 2013, 0(4): 55-65.
[15] 刘小萌. 旗籍朝鲜人安氏的家世与家事[J]. 清史研究, 2013, 0(4): 1-19.
版权所有 © 2011 《清史研究》编辑部
地址:北京中关村大街59号 邮编:100872 电话:62511428
技术支持 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司