主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 87-101.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

晚清京师政治中“同治”话语的形成与变异

  

  1. 中国人民大学历史学院
  • 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
  • 作者简介:高波(1982—),男,中国人民大学历史学院讲师,北京 100872; gaobo122@gmail.com

The Formation and Variation of the “Ruling Together” Discourse in Central Politics n the Late Qing

  1. School of History, Renmin University of China
  • Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05
  • About author:GAO Bo (School of History, Renmin University of China; gaobo122@gmail.com)

摘要: 清代缙绅录中的“各省额中举人名数”,有两个固化的名数系统:一是乾隆中期到咸丰八年,沿用乾隆二十九年宝名堂刊本所载名数,该系统应是采用乾隆十五年至二十七年间某科乡试各省取中的举人数。二是光绪十一年冬季荣禄堂刊本所载名数,该系统采录光绪八年壬午科乡试各省取中的举人数,被此后不同坊刻本缙绅录中广泛载录,甚至在科举停废后仍然沿用。在此之间的缙绅录,虽有少数省份的“额中举人名数”变动不居,但无法反映晚清朝廷因推行捐输乡试广额政策导致各省历届乡试中额剧烈变动的真实情况。故缙绅录中的“各省额中举人名数”,不仅与各省乡试实际取中举人数无涉,而且资讯采录偶然、随意,不具典型性和代表性。清代缙绅录所载各类资讯的史料价值和局限,值得研究者警惕。

Abstract: After the 1861 Coup, in order to justify the prince’s regency and the empress dowagers’“ reign behind the curtain,” which violated laws handed down from forefathers of the Qing dynasty, Prince Gong and both empress dowagers, following the example of the“ Shunzhi” emperor, chose“ ruling together” as the reign title to establish their own legitimacy. The key figure in the “ruling together” discourse was Prince Gong, who was regarded as the contemporary Prince Dorgon. However, after the middle of the“ ruling together” period, as the authority of the two empress dowagers (pecially Cixi) was increasing and the“ Clear Stream” faction was rising in Beijing, a new explanation of legitimacy began to appear. Hoping to establish a new pattern in which the inner court ruled with the bureaucracy, the“ Clear Stream” faction followed the example of Yuanyou” in the Song dynasty, regarding the two empress dowagers as the queen mother of emperor Shenzong of Song, and themselves as the“ wise men of Yuanyou.” This discourse provided legitimacy for the two empress dowagers and the“ Clear Stream” faction that exceeded the norms handed down from forefathers of the Qing dynasty, however, after the 1880s, as emperor Guangxu grew older, and new scholarship, such as Gongyang Studies, became popular among the political elites in Beijing, the new generation of the“ Clear Stream” faction began to hold a more positive attitude toward the Xifeng Reform of the Song emperor Shenzong. The“ Clear Stream” faction expected to“ rule together” with emperor Guangxu, like Wang Anshi with the Song emperor Shenzong. Therefore, their relationship with Cixi became increasingly tense, which eventually led to the termination of the 100 Days Reform by Cixi, meaning that“ ruling together” based on limited cooperation among political elites in Beijing since 1861 had failed. Since then, discourses such as“ ruling together” and“ Yuanyou” became increasingly formalized and hollowed out in the actual political processes, and alternative discourses such as civil rights and constitution began to emerge.